The Bombs Have Fallen on Tehran. Here Is Everything You Need to Know, And Everything You Are Being Misled About

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel reported that they had conducted joint military strikes on Iran.¹ Explosions were reported in central Tehran, according to the semiofficial Iranian news station and agency Fars.² The full extent of damage and casualties is not yet known. The conflict is active. What is known — the order of battle, the aircraft overhead, the ideology on the ground, and the history that made this moment possible — is worth setting down clearly, without the conspiratorial fog that already surrounds it on social media and without the sanitized media framing that strips the last forty-seven years of their meaning.

This is TCL's account. It is conservative, Western, pro-civilization, and we stands unambiguously with the Iranian people: the men and women who have been dying in the streets for months demanding the same freedoms we experience on a daily basis. We do not know what the aftermath of these strikes looks like. We know what the alternative was: a nuclear-armed theocracy, run by men who have spent forty-seven years executing their own citizens, funding terrorism across four continents, and promising the annihilation of the Jewish state. That was the alternative. Keep it in mind.

The USS Gerald R. Ford, the largest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the world,³ departed Souda Bay in Crete on Thursday and sailed east toward Israel's coast.⁴ On board: four F/A-18 Super Hornet squadrons, an EA-18G Growler electronic warfare squadron, E-2D Advanced Hawkeye early warning aircraft, and helicopter detachments.⁵

In the Arabian Sea, the USS Abraham Lincoln has been operating since late January,⁶ after being redeployed from the South China Sea. Its air wing includes F/A-18 squadrons, an F-35C Lightning II squadron, EA-18G electronic warfare aircraft, E-2D early warning planes, and helicopters.⁷

The U.S. struck targets using aircraft and Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles, a U.S. official confirmed to Air and Space Forces Magazine.

The air component is where the picture becomes particularly significant. Between February 24 and 26 alone, 38 additional fighters arrived at RAF Lakenheath, England: 12 F-22 Raptors, 14 F-15E Strike Eagles, and 12 F-35A Lightning IIs, all staging through the base before continuing to the theater.⁸ The F-22 deployment to Israel's Ovda Airbase represents the first time the Raptor has been positioned in Israel for real-world combat operations.⁹ In the June 2025 12-Day War with Iran — the operation the Pentagon designated Midnight Hammer¹⁰ — F-22s escorted B-2 Spirit stealth bombers during strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, helping suppress and defeat Iranian air defenses.¹¹

Alongside fighters, E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft have been deployed — the AWACS, critical for orchestrating complex air operations, providing sustained situational awareness, and managing the battle space during a multi-axis strike campaign.

The U.S. is not deploying a major ground force. It deployed more than 500,000 troops during Operation Desert Storm¹² and roughly 250,000 in Iraq in 2003.¹³ The current package is strikes-based; designed for attacking targets in Iran and defending against retaliation, not occupation. Defence analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies have noted that this posture is consistent with a campaign targeting Iran's¹⁴ nuclear infrastructure,¹⁵ command nodes, and air defense architecture, not a land war.

In Jordan, Muwaffaq Salti Air Base became the Pentagon's most critical deployment hub¹⁶ after Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and other Gulf states reportedly refused to allow their territory to be used for strikes on Iran.¹⁷Satellite images taken by the Associated Press on February 21 revealed more than 60 strike aircraft at the base, including F-35s, F-15E Strike Eagles, and A-10 Thunderbolt IIs, alongside transport aircraft and EA-18G electronic warfare jets.¹⁸

That detail matters enormously, and we will return to it.

The protest movement that preceded these strikes deserves more than a news ticker.

Beginning in January 2026, Iranian authorities responded to demonstrations with a coordinated escalation in lethal force.¹⁹ On January 8, the regime cut all internet access to the country.²⁰ Human Rights Watch found evidence of protesters and bystanders being shot in the head and torso.²¹ The Iranian government placed the death toll at 3,117;²² human rights activists counted at least 6,126 dead,²³ while acknowledging the true number could not be independently verified given the communications blackout.

Six thousand one hundred and twenty-six people shot by their own government, all for demanding the right to exist freely in their own country.

On January 13, speaking in Detroit, Trump told Iranian protesters to "keep protesting"²⁴ and that "help is on its way,"²⁵ vowing to punish security forces responsible for the killings. Whatever one thinks of Trump's style, those words were not cheap. They were followed by the largest military buildup in the Middle East since 2003.²⁶ The Iranians dying in the streets were told help was coming. Today, it arrived.

To understand what Iran is now, you have to understand what Iran was, and what it could become again.

Persia is one of the oldest continuous civilizations on earth.²⁷ The Achaemenid Empire, founded by Cyrus the Great around 550 BC,²⁸ was the largest empire the ancient world had yet seen, stretching from the Aegean Sea to the Indus River.²⁹ Cyrus issued what historians regard as the first known declaration of human rights — the Cyrus Cylinder, which guaranteed freedom of religion and prohibited slavery within his domain. He established racial equality, and freed many slaves.³⁰

By the 1970s, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi maintained close ties with the United States during most of his reign.³¹ He pursued a Westernizing, modernizing economic policy and a strongly pro-Western foreign policy;³² he also made a number of visits to America,³³ where he was regarded as a friend. Iran's long border with America's Cold War rival,³⁴ the Soviet Union, and its position as the largest, most powerful country in the oil-rich Persian Gulf, made it a "pillar" of U.S. foreign policy.

Women were encouraged to get an education, allowed to mix freely with men, gained the right to vote in the mid-1960s, and the first female representatives were elected to parliament. The hijab was outlawed. Women were encouraged to dress in modern Western-style clothing.³⁸

In 1977, the last "normal" year before the revolution, Iran's economy was 26 percent larger than Turkey's and 65 percent higher than South Korea's.³⁵ South Korea in 1977. Iran was ahead of South Korea in 1977. South Korea today is one of the wealthiest, most technologically advanced countries on earth.³⁶ Iran today has a per-capita GDP roughly equivalent to Albania's.³⁷

That is the cost of 1979. Measured in dollars. Measured in forty-seven years of compounding lost prosperity for a civilization.

Before this article ends, a specific claim needs to be addressed directly, because it circulates widely in both far-left and far-right spaces and it is not true: the claim that Israel controls Western foreign policy and that the strikes on Iran are being conducted on Israel's behalf, by a United States government that acts as an extension of Israeli strategic interests.

The evidence directly contradicts this.

The United States has maintained military facilities across at least nineteen sites in the Middle East — in Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere.³⁹ Its strategic interests in the region predate the modern state of Israel and include Cold War containment of Soviet influence, protection of Persian Gulf oil shipping lanes, counterterrorism operations, and nonproliferation (actions designed to prevent the spread of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons). These are American interests. They are not Israeli interests wearing an American uniform.

More specifically: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates stated or suggested they would not permit the United States to use their airspace or bases to conduct strikes on Iran.⁴⁰ Some made their announcements after conversations with senior Iranian officials. These are not Israeli-controlled governments. These are Arab Muslim states, the very governments that conspiracy theorists claim are subordinate to Israeli direction, and they were actively blocking American military operations. The United States had to find alternative basing arrangements precisely because the Arab world was not cooperating.

The UAE's Al-Dhafra Air Base remained operational,⁴¹ though Emirati officials made clear they would not allow their territory to be used for an attack. In Oman, facilities could provide logistical support.

This is not the picture of a Western military apparatus under Israeli control. It is the picture of the United States acting on its own strategic assessment of a nuclear-adjacent theocratic regime that has killed thousands of its own citizens, partners with Hezbollah⁴² and Hamas,⁴³ launched ballistic missiles at American military bases, and pursued an enrichment program that the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly found to be non-compliant with inspection protocols.⁴⁴

The "Israel controls the West" framework is not conservative analysis. It is, at its functional core, a conspiracy theory that protects the Iranian regime from accountability by attributing Western opposition to it to a Jewish conspiracy rather than to the regime's documented record. Every time this theory is applied to an event like today's strikes, it redirects moral responsibility away from the men who shot 6,126 protesters in the head and toward the Jewish state that has been on the receiving end of their missiles. That is not honest analysis.

This publication does not claim to know whether these strikes were the right decision in every tactical and strategic dimension. Military campaigns are complex. Unintended consequences are real, and a — rather unfortunate — consequence of conflict. The question of what comes after the Islamic Republic, who fills the vacuum, how stable the transition is, whether the Iranian people get the country they deserve, is unanswered and genuinely difficult.

What we do know is this:

The Iranian people have spent forty-seven years under a regime that threatened violence to women for showing their hair,⁴⁵ hanged homosexuals from cranes,⁴⁶ exported terrorism to four continents, held American diplomats hostage for 444 days,⁴⁷ and killed more than six thousand of its own citizens in the past two months alone. They have been asking, in blood, for something different.

Trump, with all his contradictions and all his rough edges, told them help was on the way. The USS Gerald R. Ford and the USS Abraham Lincoln and twelve F-22 Raptors over Ovda Airbase in the Negev desert were his answer. Whether that answer produces the outcome the Iranian people deserve is unknown. That it was aimed at a regime that deserves to fall is beyond serious dispute.

Persia built one of the great civilizations in human history. It was modernizing into a first-world economy during the 1970s. A theocratic counterrevolution took all of that away and replaced it with forty-seven years of cruelty, isolation, and death.

The people in the streets of Tehran in January were chanting for their country back.

We hope they get it.

Key sources (NOTE: See footnotes/citations below for APA7): 2026 United States Military Buildup in the Middle East, Wikipedia (verified February 28, 2026); The Aviationist, "Additional Fighters Reinforce U.S. Buildup," February 26, 2026; Air and Space Forces Magazine, "F-22s to Israel, F-35s and F-15Es to Europe," February 27, 2026; Military Times, February 26, 2026; PBS NewsHour/Associated Press, February 26, 2026; Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), February 27, 2026; Israel Hayom, "The Military Buildup Map Behind Trump's Iran Decision," February 27, 2026; Al Jazeera, tracking report, February 20, 2026; Human Rights Watch, Iran crackdown documentation, January 2026; Britannica, "Iranian Revolution"; Middle East Forum, "Why Iran's 1979 Upheaval Was a Counterrevolution," July 2025; Stanford University, Iranian Revolution historical review; U.S. Central Command official statements.

‌

‌

‌